Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs LQD: how they differ
BINC is an equity index fund and LQD a bond index fund, and over the year BINC returned more, +2.0% against −2.7%.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Flexible Income | US investment grade bonds |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | −2.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | −20.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.14% |
| Holdings | 4124 | not filed |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
LQD in plain words
LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or LQD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and LQD returned −2.7%, so BINC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against LQD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BINC-LQD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources