Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs IJR: how they differ
BINC and IJR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJR returned more over the year.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and IJR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BINC | Only in IJR |
|---|---|
| UMBS, TBA 5.13% | FORMFACTOR INC 0.69% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.81% | VIASAT INC 0.68% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.14% | MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.66% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.10% | ARGAN INC 0.62% |
| UMBS, TBA 1.52% | BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.61% |
| iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02% | ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61% |
| iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64% | MAXLINEAR INC 0.60% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.53% | KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC 0.54% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Flexible Income | S&P SmallCap 600 |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | +19.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | +2.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.06% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 4124 | 603 |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
IJR in plain words
IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or IJR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and IJR returned +19.9%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do BINC and IJR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 2% of BINC and 0% of IJR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against IJR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BINC-IJR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources