Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs EWY: how they differ
BINC and EWY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWY returned more over the year.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and EWY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BINC | Only in EWY |
|---|---|
| UMBS, TBA 5.13% | SK hynix Inc. 31.02% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.81% | SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD 3.44% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.14% | SK Square Co., Ltd. 3.10% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.10% | HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.45% |
| UMBS, TBA 1.52% | KB Financial Group Inc. 1.40% |
| iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02% | HYUNDAI MOBIS CO.,LTD 1.22% |
| iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64% | DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO., LTD. 1.22% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.53% | SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. 1.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Flexible Income | MSCI South Korea |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | +147.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | +130.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.59% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 4124 | 82 |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
EWY in plain words
EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 70.0%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or EWY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and EWY returned +147.9%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do BINC and EWY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 2% of BINC and 0% of EWY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against EWY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BINC-EWY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources