Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BIL vs USFR: how they differ
BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and USFR a bond index fund, and over the year they finished level, +3.7% against +4.1%.
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.
| BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | WisdomTree |
| What it is | 1-3 month T-bills | Floating Rate Treasury |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.8 pts | −13.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | not filed | 4 |
BIL in plain words
BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
USFR in plain words
USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or USFR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and USFR returned +4.1%, so USFR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or USFR?
- BIL charges 0.14% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against USFR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BIL-USFR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources