Which returned more over the last year, BIL or DBMF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BIL or DBMF?

BIL charges 0.14% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BIL vs DBMF: how they differ

BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and DBMF an equity index fund, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +3.7%.

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF.

BIL and DBMF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	State Street	iMGP
What it is	1-3 month T-bills	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+3.7%	+25.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.8 pts	+7.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.14%	0.85%

BIL in plain words

BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or DBMF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BIL or DBMF?: BIL charges 0.14% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIL against DBMF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against DBMF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BIL-DBMF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources