Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs XRT: how they differ

AVUV and XRT hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and XRT hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVXRT
Macy's Inc0.78%1.38%
Five Below Inc0.72%1.24%
PriceSmart Inc0.60%1.51%
Urban Outfitters Inc0.55%1.32%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co0.45%1.43%
CarMax Inc0.45%1.48%
Academy Sports & Outdoors Inc0.41%1.28%
American Eagle Outfitters Inc0.30%1.33%
Lithia Motors Inc0.29%1.29%
Kohl's Corp0.28%1.51%
Victoria's Secret & Co0.22%1.52%
Ingles Markets Inc0.20%1.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in XRT
Viasat Inc 1.39%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Matson Inc 0.98%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Lear Corp 0.90%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
SM Energy Co 0.86%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
Avnet Inc 0.86%Coupang Inc 1.55%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Iridium Communications Inc 0.71%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
Cabot Corp 0.71%Dollar Tree Inc 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+24.6%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.35%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%22.5%
Holdings79575

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and XRT returned −3.0%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or XRT?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so AVUV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources