Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AVUV vs KRE: how they differ
AVUV and KRE hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and KRE hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AVUV | KRE |
|---|---|---|
| Axos Financial Inc | 0.56% | 1.18% |
| Bank OZK | 0.55% | 1.29% |
| International Bancshares Corp | 0.46% | 0.78% |
| First BanCorp/Puerto Rico | 0.44% | 1.04% |
| Hancock Whitney Corp | 0.42% | 1.34% |
| Columbia Banking System Inc | 0.40% | 1.34% |
| Fulton Financial Corp | 0.39% | 1.35% |
| BankUnited Inc | 0.38% | 1.20% |
| Cathay General Bancorp | 0.34% | 0.75% |
| Texas Capital Bancshares Inc | 0.33% | 1.30% |
| Associated Banc-Corp | 0.33% | 1.36% |
| Bancorp Inc/The | 0.27% | 0.97% |
| Only in AVUV | Only in KRE |
|---|---|
| Viasat Inc 1.39% | Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc 1.37% |
| Matson Inc 0.98% | Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37% |
| Lear Corp 0.90% | Citizens Financial Group Inc 1.37% |
| SM Energy Co 0.86% | Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36% |
| Avnet Inc 0.86% | Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc 1.35% |
| Macy's Inc 0.78% | First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35% |
| StoneX Group Inc 0.77% | Webster Financial Corp 1.35% |
| Five Below Inc 0.72% | M&T Bank Corp 1.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | KRE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Avantis | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Small Cap Value | SPDR S&P Regional Banking |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.6% | +16.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +7.2 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 6.7% |
| Holdings | 795 | 161 |
AVUV in plain words
AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.
KRE in plain words
KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or KRE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and KRE returned +16.1%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AVUV or KRE?
- AVUV charges 0.25% a year and KRE charges 0.35%, so AVUV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AVUV and KRE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 7% of KRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against KRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-KRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources