Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs ITOT: how they differ

AVUV and ITOT hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and ITOT hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and ITOT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVITOT
Mueller Industries Inc0.07%0.02%
Sanmina Corp0.06%0.02%
Viasat Inc1.39%0.02%
Argan Inc0.36%0.01%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.04%0.01%
Columbia Banking System Inc0.40%0.01%
Five Below Inc0.72%0.01%
Ryder System Inc0.60%0.01%
UMB Financial Corp0.06%0.01%
Zions Bancorp NA0.05%0.01%
EnerSys0.20%0.01%
Terex Corp0.39%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in ITOT
Noble Corp PLC 0.57%NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%
Weatherford International PLC 0.57%Apple, Inc. 5.82%
Alkermes PLC 0.51%Microsoft Corp. 3.80%
International Seaways Inc 0.51%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%
Signet Jewelers Ltd 0.48%Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%
Valaris Ltd 0.47%Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%
Essent Group Ltd 0.46%Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%
LivaNova PLC 0.44%Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueCore S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%88.3%
Holdings7952497

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or ITOT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or ITOT?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources