Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs FTEC: how they differ

AVUV and FTEC hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and FTEC hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and FTEC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVFTEC
Viasat Inc1.39%0.12%
Plexus Corp0.69%0.12%
Avnet Inc0.86%0.11%
Sanmina Corp0.06%0.16%
Vishay Intertechnology Inc0.64%0.06%
Benchmark Electronics Inc0.46%0.05%
Photronics Inc0.33%0.05%
Vistance Networks Inc0.05%0.04%
SolarEdge Technologies Inc0.27%0.04%
Arrow Electronics Inc0.04%0.13%
ePlus Inc0.22%0.04%
Alarm.com Holdings Inc0.09%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in FTEC
Matson Inc 0.98%NVIDIA Corp 18.00%
Lear Corp 0.90%Apple Inc 14.38%
SM Energy Co 0.86%Microsoft Corp 9.54%
Macy's Inc 0.78%Broadcom Inc 5.01%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%Micron Technology Inc 2.64%
Five Below Inc 0.72%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60%
Iridium Communications Inc 0.71%Intel Corp 1.99%
Cabot Corp 0.71%Cisco Systems Inc 1.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisFidelity
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueMSCI Information Technology
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+35.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts+18.2 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.08%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%86.2%
Holdings795282

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or FTEC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or FTEC?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against FTEC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources