Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUV vs FBCG: how they differ

AVUV and FBCG hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and AVUV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUV and FBCG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUV and FBCG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUVFBCG
Victoria's Secret & Co0.22%0.20%
PVH Corp0.50%0.13%
Five Below Inc0.72%0.10%
Lyft Inc0.26%0.08%
Urban Outfitters Inc0.55%0.07%
Terex Corp0.39%0.07%
Cheesecake Factory Inc/The0.39%0.05%
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc0.02%0.09%
Phoenix Education Partners Inc0.01%0.00%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co0.45%0.00%
American Eagle Outfitters Inc0.30%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUVOnly in FBCG
Viasat Inc 1.39%NVIDIA CORP 14.62%
Matson Inc 0.98%APPLE INC 9.64%
Lear Corp 0.90%ALPHABET INC 9.10%
SM Energy Co 0.86%AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%
Avnet Inc 0.86%MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%
Macy's Inc 0.78%META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%
StoneX Group Inc 0.77%BROADCOM INC 3.74%
Iridium Communications Inc 0.71%ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUV and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisFidelity
What it isU.S. Small Cap ValueBlue Chip Growth
Total return, 1 year+24.6%+17.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.2 pts−0.2 pts
Expense ratio0.25%0.57%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%86.8%
Holdings795214

AVUV in plain words

AVUV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Small Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 795 positions, with the top ten at 8.7%.

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUV or FBCG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUV returned +24.6% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so AVUV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUV or FBCG?
AVUV charges 0.25% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so AVUV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUV and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVUV and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUV against FBCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUV against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUV-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources