Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs XLY: how they differ

AVUS and XLY hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and XLY hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and XLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSXLY
Amazon.com Inc3.68%22.24%
Tesla Inc0.80%19.66%
TJX Cos Inc/The0.46%3.93%
Home Depot Inc/The0.35%5.83%
General Motors Co0.32%1.73%
Ross Stores Inc0.29%1.71%
Ford Motor Co0.18%1.35%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.12%0.68%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc0.12%1.09%
McDonald's Corp0.12%4.16%
Tapestry Inc0.11%0.74%
Ulta Beauty Inc0.11%0.49%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in XLY
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 1.97%
Apple Inc 5.37%Garmin Ltd 0.97%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%Carnival Corp Ltd 0.92%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%Aptiv PLC 0.32%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd 0.24%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%Domino's Pizza Inc 0.23%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%Wynn Resorts Ltd 0.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and XLY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
XLY
State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. EquityConsumer discretionary
Total return, 1 year+21.6%−4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−21.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%100.0%
Holdings187547

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

XLY in plain words

XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 69.2%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or XLY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and XLY returned −4.1%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or XLY?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so XLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against XLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against XLY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-XLY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources