Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs SPHD: how they differ

AVUS and SPHD hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and SPHD hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSSPHD
Exxon Mobil Corp1.07%1.55%
Chevron Corp0.54%2.10%
Verizon Communications Inc0.46%3.49%
AT&T Inc0.33%2.02%
Williams Cos Inc/The0.31%1.61%
EOG Resources Inc0.29%1.99%
Comcast Corp0.21%1.60%
US Bancorp0.21%1.62%
Pfizer Inc0.18%2.99%
ONEOK Inc0.15%2.66%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.15%2.08%
Fifth Third Bancorp0.13%1.33%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in SPHD
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
Apple Inc 5.37%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%Realty Income Corp. 2.43%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Amcor PLC 2.41%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%Crown Castle Inc. 2.41%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%Conagra Brands, Inc. 2.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVUS and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisInvesco
What it isU.S. EquityS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%95.7%
Holdings187549

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or SPHD?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources