Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs KRE: how they differ

AVUS and KRE hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and KRE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and KRE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSKRE
Truist Financial Corp0.11%1.27%
Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH0.09%1.33%
M&T Bank Corp0.08%1.35%
East West Bancorp Inc0.07%1.28%
Regions Financial Corp0.06%1.34%
Citizens Financial Group Inc0.06%1.37%
Zions Bancorp NA0.04%1.33%
Wintrust Financial Corp0.04%1.32%
Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc0.04%1.37%
Popular Inc0.04%1.33%
Webster Financial Corp0.03%1.35%
Western Alliance Bancorp0.03%1.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in KRE
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Coastal Financial Corp/WA 0.41%
Apple Inc 5.37%Mechanics Bancorp 0.23%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and KRE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
KRE
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. EquitySPDR S&P Regional Banking
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+16.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%6.7%
Holdings1875161

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

KRE in plain words

KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or KRE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and KRE returned +16.1%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or KRE?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and KRE charges 0.35%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and KRE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 7% of KRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against KRE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against KRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-KRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources