Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs FTEC: how they differ

AVUS and FTEC hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and FTEC hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and FTEC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSFTEC
NVIDIA Corp5.49%18.00%
Apple Inc5.37%14.38%
Microsoft Corp3.85%9.54%
Micron Technology Inc2.40%2.64%
Broadcom Inc1.18%5.01%
Lam Research Corp1.00%1.49%
Applied Materials Inc0.68%1.45%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc0.67%2.60%
Intel Corp0.58%1.99%
KLA Corp0.51%1.09%
QUALCOMM Inc0.41%0.92%
Sandisk Corp/DE0.41%0.80%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in FTEC
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%Accenture PLC 0.53%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%NXP Semiconductors NV 0.40%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%TE Connectivity PLC 0.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.20%Microchip Technology Inc 0.30%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.07%Flex Ltd 0.25%
Caterpillar Inc 0.92%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.21%
Eli Lilly & Co 0.84%Roper Technologies Inc 0.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and FTEC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisFidelity
What it isU.S. EquityMSCI Information Technology
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+35.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts+18.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%86.2%
Holdings1875282

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or FTEC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and FTEC returned +35.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or FTEC?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and FTEC charges 0.08%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and FTEC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 86% of FTEC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against FTEC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against FTEC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-FTEC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources