Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs FBCG: how they differ

AVUS and FBCG hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and FBCG hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and FBCG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSFBCG
NVIDIA Corp5.49%14.62%
Apple Inc5.37%9.64%
Microsoft Corp3.85%5.20%
Amazon.com Inc3.68%8.43%
Alphabet Inc2.42%9.10%
Meta Platforms Inc2.21%3.90%
Broadcom Inc1.18%3.74%
Eli Lilly & Co0.84%2.25%
Micron Technology Inc2.40%0.82%
Tesla Inc0.80%1.45%
Mastercard Inc0.48%0.81%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.45%0.69%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in FBCG
Alphabet Inc 1.94%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.20%CELESTICA INC 0.88%
Applied Materials Inc 0.68%SHARKNINJA INC 0.67%
Walmart Inc 0.64%WELLTOWER INC 0.58%
Merck & Co Inc 0.63%FTAI AVIATION LTD 0.49%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.61%ARITZIA INC 0.39%
Intel Corp 0.58%SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.38%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.46%SNAP INC 0.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisFidelity
What it isU.S. EquityBlue Chip Growth
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+17.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts−0.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.57%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%86.8%
Holdings1875214

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or FBCG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or FBCG?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against FBCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources