Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs COWZ: how they differ

AVUS and COWZ hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and COWZ hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and COWZ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSCOWZ
Verizon Communications Inc0.46%1.90%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.45%1.84%
ConocoPhillips0.41%2.17%
QUALCOMM Inc0.41%2.67%
AT&T Inc0.33%1.84%
EOG Resources Inc0.29%1.23%
Target Corp0.25%1.07%
Devon Energy Corp0.24%1.09%
Delta Air Lines Inc0.24%1.48%
Marathon Petroleum Corp0.23%1.78%
United Parcel Service Inc0.22%1.69%
Comcast Corp0.21%1.71%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in COWZ
NVIDIA Corp 5.49%Altria Group Inc 2.21%
Apple Inc 5.37%Accenture PLC 1.68%
Microsoft Corp 3.85%HP Inc 1.03%
Amazon.com Inc 3.68%Omnicom Group Inc 0.84%
Alphabet Inc 2.42%Roper Technologies Inc 0.78%
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Coterra Energy Inc 0.63%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.21%Flex Ltd 0.59%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%TechnipFMC PLC 0.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVUS and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisPacer
What it isU.S. EquityUS Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+23.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts+5.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.49%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%95.8%
Holdings1875100

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or COWZ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or COWZ?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and COWZ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 96% of COWZ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against COWZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against COWZ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-COWZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources