Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AOR vs FBCG: how they differ
AOR and FBCG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOR | Only in FBCG |
|---|---|
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07% | NVIDIA CORP 14.62% |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09% | APPLE INC 9.64% |
| iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02% | ALPHABET INC 9.10% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29% | AMAZON.COM INC 8.43% |
| iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.20% |
| iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99% | META PLATFORMS INC 3.90% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96% | BROADCOM INC 3.74% |
| ELI LILLY and CO 2.25% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Blue Chip Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +17.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | −0.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.57% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 86.8% |
| Holdings | 7 | 214 |
AOR in plain words
AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
FBCG in plain words
FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or FBCG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or FBCG?
- AOR charges 0.15% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AOR and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources