Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AOR vs EEM: how they differ

AOR and EEM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AOROnly in EEM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28%
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09%SK hynix Inc. 6.65%
iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02%Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29%Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08%
iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57%MediaTek Inc. 1.62%
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99%DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96%HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AOR and EEM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore 60/40 Balanced AllocationEmerging markets
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+32.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts+14.8 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.72%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings71245

AOR in plain words

AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or EEM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and EEM returned +32.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AOR or EEM?
AOR charges 0.15% a year and EEM charges 0.72%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AOR and EEM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 0% of EEM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AOR against EEM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against EEM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-EEM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources