Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

HELO vs QBER: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QBER moved less with the S&P 500 than HELO: correlation −0.69 against +0.95.

JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF and TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF.

+0.95HELO correlation with the S&P 500
−0.69QBER correlation with the S&P 500
56.2%HELO down-week capture
−15.4%QBER down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: QBER scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

HELO 21.4QBER 89.34.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

HELOFell 56% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%HELO−0.70%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%HELO−0.70%Average week when SPY fell
QBERRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%QBER+0.19%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%QBER+0.19%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

HELO and QBER both run a hedged equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, HELO’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.95 with the S&P 500 and QBER’s −0.69. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, HELO averaged −0.70% and QBER +0.19%. Over the same weeks, HELO finished 3.3 percentage points ahead of cash and QBER finished 4.0 points behind cash.

Performance, window by window

HELO and QBER over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
HELOQBERHELOQBER
3 months+1.9%+0.2%−0.4 pts−2.1 pts
6 months+7.8%−1.3%−10.3 pts−19.3 pts
1 year+7.1%−0.4%−9.5 pts−16.9 pts
Since launch+41.1%−0.4%−43.7 pts−43.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
HELO and QBER on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options
QBER
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options
IssuerJPMorganTrueShares
StrategyHedged equityHedged equity
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.95−0.69
Beta to the S&P 500+0.53−0.14
Down-week capture56.2%−15.4%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.70%+0.19%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+7.0%−0.4%
Against T-bills, percentage points+3.3 pts−4.0 pts
Expense ratio0.50%0.79%
ListedSep 29, 2023Jul 1, 2024
Net assets$4.8bn$62m

HELO in plain words

HELO is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.95 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.53, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.53% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks HELO fell 0.70% on average, a down-week capture of 56.2%. Over the same 52 weeks HELO returned +7.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 3.3 percentage points ahead of cash.

QBER in plain words

QBER is a hedged equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.69 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.14, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.14% the other way. In the same weeks QBER rose 0.19% on average, a down-week capture of −15.4%. Over the same 52 weeks QBER returned −0.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 4.0 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, HELO or QBER?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, HELO’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.95 with the S&P 500 and QBER’s −0.69, so QBER moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, HELO or QBER?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, HELO averaged −0.70% and QBER +0.19%, so QBER returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, HELO or QBER?
Over the same weeks, HELO finished 3.3 percentage points ahead of cash and QBER finished 4.0 percentage points behind cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, HELO or QBER?
HELO charges 0.50% a year and QBER charges 0.79%, so HELO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HELO against QBER, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HELO against QBER, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/helo-vs-qber Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources