Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAOS vs ZHDG: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CAOS moved less with the S&P 500 than ZHDG: correlation −0.40 against +0.96.

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF and ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF.

−0.40CAOS correlation with the S&P 500
+0.96ZHDG correlation with the S&P 500
−6.2%CAOS down-week capture
90.0%ZHDG down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CAOS scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CAOS 84.9ZHDG 11.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CAOSRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%CAOS+0.08%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CAOS+0.08%Average week when SPY fell
ZHDGFell 90% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%ZHDG−1.12%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%ZHDG−1.12%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CAOS and ZHDG both run a hedged equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CAOS’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.40 with the S&P 500 and ZHDG’s +0.96. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CAOS averaged +0.08% and ZHDG −1.12%. Over the same weeks, CAOS finished 2.6 percentage points behind cash and ZHDG finished 3.9 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CAOS and ZHDG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CAOSZHDGCAOSZHDG
3 months+0.1%+1.0%−2.1 pts−1.2 pts
6 months−0.2%+11.9%−18.2 pts−6.1 pts
1 year+1.1%+8.2%−15.5 pts−8.4 pts
3 years+10.5%+44.9%−67.9 pts−33.5 pts
Since launch+17.6%+33.0%−79.9 pts−55.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAOS and ZHDG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options
IssuerAlpha ArchitectZega
StrategyHedged equityHedged equity
Correlation with the S&P 500−0.40+0.96
Beta to the S&P 500−0.04+0.79
Down-week capture−6.2%90.0%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.08%−1.12%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+1.1%+7.6%
Against T-bills, percentage points−2.6 pts+3.9 pts
Expense ratio0.63%0.95%
ListedMar 6, 2023Jul 7, 2021
Net assets$705m$35m

CAOS in plain words

CAOS is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.40 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.04, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.04% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CAOS rose 0.08% on average, a down-week capture of −6.2%. Over the same 52 weeks CAOS returned +1.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 2.6 percentage points behind cash.

ZHDG in plain words

ZHDG is a hedged equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.96 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.79, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.79% the same way. In the same weeks ZHDG fell 1.12% on average, a down-week capture of 90.0%. Over the same 52 weeks ZHDG returned +7.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 3.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CAOS or ZHDG?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CAOS’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.40 with the S&P 500 and ZHDG’s +0.96, so CAOS moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CAOS or ZHDG?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CAOS averaged +0.08% and ZHDG −1.12%, so CAOS returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CAOS or ZHDG?
Over the same weeks, CAOS finished 2.6 percentage points behind cash and ZHDG finished 3.9 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CAOS or ZHDG?
CAOS charges 0.63% a year and ZHDG charges 0.95%, so CAOS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAOS against ZHDG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAOS against ZHDG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/caos-vs-zhdg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources