Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAOS vs XCLR: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CAOS moved less with the S&P 500 than XCLR: correlation −0.40 against +0.94.

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF.

−0.40CAOS correlation with the S&P 500
+0.94XCLR correlation with the S&P 500
−6.2%CAOS down-week capture
76.6%XCLR down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CAOS scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CAOS 84.9XCLR 15.54.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CAOSRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%CAOS+0.08%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CAOS+0.08%Average week when SPY fell
XCLRFell 77% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%XCLR−0.95%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%XCLR−0.95%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CAOS and XCLR both run a hedged equity strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CAOS’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.40 with the S&P 500 and XCLR’s +0.94. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CAOS averaged +0.08% and XCLR −0.95%. Over the same weeks, CAOS finished 2.6 percentage points behind cash and XCLR finished 2.1 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CAOS and XCLR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CAOSXCLRCAOSXCLR
3 months+0.1%+1.0%−2.1 pts−1.2 pts
6 months−0.2%+9.3%−18.2 pts−8.7 pts
1 year+1.1%+5.5%−15.5 pts−11.1 pts
3 years+10.5%+46.9%−67.9 pts−31.5 pts
Since launch+17.6%+43.7%−79.9 pts−39.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAOS and XCLR on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
Hedged equity fund: owns stocks and pays for protection against a fall, most often with put options
IssuerAlpha ArchitectGlobal X
StrategyHedged equityHedged equity
Correlation with the S&P 500−0.40+0.94
Beta to the S&P 500−0.04+0.66
Down-week capture−6.2%76.6%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.08%−0.95%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+1.1%+5.7%
Against T-bills, percentage points−2.6 pts+2.1 pts
Expense ratio0.63%0.25%
ListedMar 6, 2023Aug 26, 2021
Net assets$705m$4m

CAOS in plain words

CAOS is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.40 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.04, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.04% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CAOS rose 0.08% on average, a down-week capture of −6.2%. Over the same 52 weeks CAOS returned +1.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 2.6 percentage points behind cash.

XCLR in plain words

XCLR is a hedged equity fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.94 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.66, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.66% the same way. In the same weeks XCLR fell 0.95% on average, a down-week capture of 76.6%. Over the same 52 weeks XCLR returned +5.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 2.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CAOS or XCLR?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CAOS’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.40 with the S&P 500 and XCLR’s +0.94, so CAOS moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CAOS or XCLR?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CAOS averaged +0.08% and XCLR −0.95%, so CAOS returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CAOS or XCLR?
Over the same weeks, CAOS finished 2.6 percentage points behind cash and XCLR finished 2.1 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CAOS or XCLR?
CAOS charges 0.63% a year and XCLR charges 0.25%, so XCLR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAOS against XCLR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAOS against XCLR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/caos-vs-xclr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources