Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

OGIG vs ONLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OGIG returned −15.6% to ONLN's +3.2%; 11% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OGIG and ONLN

Net assets: $108m on Aug 31, 2026 for ALPS | O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF Shares, and $61m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Online Retail ETF.

At a glance
58.8%
OGIG in the S&P 500
41.3%
ONLN in the S&P 500
−15.6%
OGIG total return, 1 year
+3.2%
ONLN total return, 1 year
OGIG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 41% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
41% of its weight is outside the S&P 50059% of OGIG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 41% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.59%41%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 83% · top ten 42% of the fund · 54 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 54% in41% of its weight is outside the S&P 50059% of OGIG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 41% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.59%41%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 83% · Nasdaq-100: 54% in

59% of OGIG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 41% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

ONLN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 59% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
59% of its weight is outside the S&P 50041% of ONLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.41%59%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 69% of the fund · 21 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 33% in59% of its weight is outside the S&P 50041% of ONLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.41%59%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 96% · Nasdaq-100: 33% in

41% of ONLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

OGIG costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.8 points.

OGIG vs ONLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureOGIGONLN
Return
Total return, 1 year−15.6%+3.2%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high25.5%, high on Feb 12, 202133.3%, high on Feb 12, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksInternet and e-commerceInternet and e-commerce
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.48%0.58%
Net assets, OGIG as of Aug 31, 2026 and ONLN as of Nov 4, 2026$108m$61m
Holdings
Holdings in common11%

Method

What they share

11%

By the books each fund has filed, OGIG and ONLN hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

11% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OGIG ONLN
Amazon.com Inc 5.63% 23.35%
Pdd Holdings Inc 2.28% 5.17%
Mercadolibre Inc 2.17% 4.19%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.99% 7.76%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in OGIG
Microsoft Corp 6.80%
Meta Platforms Inc 5.27%
Alphabet Inc 4.96%
Palantir Technologies Inc 4.92%
Oracle Corp 3.65%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 2.75%
Shopify Inc 2.58%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.56%
Only in ONLN
EBAY INC 8.83%
CARVANA CO 5.32%
COUPANG INC 3.93%
WILLIAMS-SONOMA INC 3.78%
REALREAL INC 3.30%
WAYFAIR INC- CLASS A 3.25%
CHEWY INC - CLASS A 3.16%
ETSY INC 3.14%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: OGIG vs ONLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowOGIGONLN
3 months−4.3%−0.5%
6 months+5.7%+1.1%
1 year−15.6%+3.2%
3 years+52.2%+96.3%
Since launchNot the same days: OGIG Jun 2018 · ONLN Jul 2018+87.9%+55.7%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

OGIG ALPS | O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF Shares · Holds 54 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 59% of its weight in S&P 500 companies ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF · Holds 21 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 41% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Internet and e-commerce Internet and e-commerce
In the S&P 500 58.8% 41.3%
Active share vs the S&P 500 82.9% 96.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 53.9% 32.7%
Holdings 54 21
Top ten, share of the fund 41.6% 68.9%
Expense ratio 0.48% 0.58%
Fee for the differing part 0.58% 0.60%
Total return, 1 year −15.6% +3.2%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −25.5% −33.3%
Net assets, OGIG as of Aug 31, 2026 and ONLN as of Nov 4, 2026 $108m $61m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

11% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

ONLN flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
OGIG

By weight, 59% of OGIG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 83%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 54 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −15.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.5% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.

ONLN

By weight, 41% of ONLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 21 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.3% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do OGIG and ONLN hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, OGIG or ONLN?
OGIG has 59% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ONLN has 41%, so ONLN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, OGIG or ONLN?
OGIG charges 0.48% a year and ONLN charges 0.58%, so OGIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OGIG against ONLN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ogig-vs-onln

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.