Data as of .
ITA vs XAR: which is really different?
ITA holds 79.5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and XAR 35.0%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: ITA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ITA and XAR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ITA | Only in XAR |
|---|---|
| GE AEROSPACE 21.81% | RTX CORP 3.34% |
| RTX 17.21% | VSE CORP 3.33% |
| BOEING 9.36% | ATI INC 3.25% |
| GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 4.82% | ARCHER AVIATION INC A 3.23% |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 4.69% | AXON ENTERPRISE INC 3.20% |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 4.44% | GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 3.11% |
| TRANSDIGM GROUP 4.31% | GENERAL ELECTRIC 3.04% |
| HOWMET AEROSPACE 4.24% | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 3.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITA | XAR | ITA | XAR | ITA | XAR | |
| 3 months | −6.3% | −12.1% | −9.6 pts | −15.4 pts | −5.5 pts | −11.3 pts |
| 6 months | −4.4% | −7.2% | −20.4 pts | −23.2 pts | −25.1 pts | −27.9 pts |
| 1 year | +10.0% | +11.8% | −7.5 pts | −5.7 pts | −13.0 pts | −11.2 pts |
| 3 years | +103.7% | +114.1% | +25.8 pts | +36.2 pts | +8.6 pts | +19.0 pts |
| Since launch | +906.7% | +1042.3% | +102.3 pts | +288.5 pts | −767.2 pts | −366.6 pts |
| ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF Holds 51 stocks in defense, 80% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XAR State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Aerospace & Defense ETF Holds 49 stocks in defense, 35% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| Theme | Defense | Defense |
| In the S&P 500 | 79.5% | 35.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 97.9% | 97.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 3.0% | 3.2% |
| Holdings | 51 | 49 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 77.5% | 31.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.38% | 0.36% |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.0% | +11.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −7.5 pts | −5.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −13.0 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Below its high | −13.5% | −17.1% |
ITA in plain words
By weight, 80% of ITA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 78% of the fund across 51 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +10.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. It sits 13.5% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.
XAR in plain words
By weight, 35% of XAR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 31% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +11.8% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. It sits 17.1% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ITA or XAR?
- ITA has 80% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XAR has 35%, so ITA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, ITA or XAR?
- ITA charges 0.37% a year and XAR charges 0.35%, so XAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITA against XAR, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ita-vs-xar Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.