Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ISHP vs ONLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ISHP returned −6.8% to ONLN's +3.2%; 16% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ISHP and ONLNNet assets: $5.3m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust S-Network E-Commerce ETF, and $61m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Online Retail ETF.
41% of ISHP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
41% of ONLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 59% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
ONLN costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.0 points; ONLN is 11.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ISHP | ONLN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −6.8% | +3.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 13.7%, high on Sep 18, 2025 | 33.3%, high on Feb 12, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Internet and e-commerce | Internet and e-commerce |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 21.8 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.58% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $5.3m | $59m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ISHP and ONLN hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
16% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ISHP | ONLN | ISHP | ONLN |
| 3 months | +0.4% | −0.5% | +1.7 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 6 months | +3.8% | +1.1% | +1.2 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 1 year | −6.8% | +3.2% | −21.8 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 3 years | +48.4% | +96.3% | −29.2 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: ISHP Oct 2016 · ONLN Jul 2018 | +105.0% | +55.7% | −122.5 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
16% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
ISHP
By weight, 41% of ISHP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 93%. The top ten holdings are 19% of the fund across 60 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −6.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 21.8 pts. It sits 13.7% below its all-time high of Sep 18, 2025.
ONLN
By weight, 41% of ONLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 69% of the fund across 21 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.3% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do ISHP and ONLN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ISHP against ONLN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ishp-vs-onln
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ISHP against ONLN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ishp-vs-onln
[ISHP against ONLN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ishp-vs-onln)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.