Data as of .
AIHY vs KAIT: which is really different?
AIHY and KAIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KAIT scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIHY and KAIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AIHY | Only in KAIT |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 21.81% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFAC 6.16% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 19.42% | SK HYNIX INC 5.67% |
| Amazon.com Inc 18.94% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 4.96% |
| Alphabet Inc 18.93% | ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS 4.30% |
| Space Exploration Technologies Corp 13.09% | ADVANTEST CORP 4.05% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 3.01% | AURAS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 3.71% |
| Oracle Corp 2.67% | LAND MARK OPTOELECTRONICS 3.61% |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd 2.06% | HANMI SEMICONDUCTOR CO LTD 3.01% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIHY | KAIT | AIHY | KAIT | AIHY | KAIT | |
| Since launch | +8.7% | +3.8% | +6.7 pts | +4.5 pts | +7.0 pts | +3.1 pts |
| AIHY Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF Holds 10 stocks in aI infrastructure and chips, 82% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | KAIT KraneShares Asia AI Technology ETF Holds 52 stocks in artificial intelligence, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Defiance | KraneShares |
| Theme | AI infrastructure and chips | Artificial intelligence |
| In the S&P 500 | 81.8% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 86.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 79.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 10 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 100.0% | 40.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.76% | not published |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.88% | not published |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% (since launch on Jul 21, 2026) | +3.8% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +6.7 pts | +4.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +7.0 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Below its high | −0.6% | −1.1% |
| Net assets | $10m | $5m |
AIHY in plain words
By weight, 82% of AIHY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 10 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 21, 2026. Since it launched on Jul 21, 2026 the fund returned +8.7% with distributions reinvested against +2.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.7 pts.
KAIT in plain words
By weight, 0% of KAIT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 52 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on Aug 19, 2026 the fund returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested against −0.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.5 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do AIHY and KAIT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AIHY or KAIT?
- AIHY has 82% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KAIT has 0%, so KAIT differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIHY against KAIT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aihy-vs-kait Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.