Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
AIFD vs PBOT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AIFD returned +21.7% to PBOT's +17.1%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AIFD and PBOTNet assets: $125m on Jul 31, 2026 for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF, and $14m on Jun 30, 2026 for Pictet AI & Automation ETF.
74% of AIFD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 26% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
61% of PBOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
Pair scorecard
PBOT costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | AIFD | PBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | +17.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 21.3%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | 17.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Artificial intelligence | Artificial intelligence |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 2.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.70% |
| Net assets, AIFD as of Jul 31, 2026 and PBOT as of Jun 30, 2026 | $125m | $14m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AIFD and PBOT hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AIFD | PBOT | AIFD | PBOT |
| 3 months | −14.4% | −8.8% | not measured | −7.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −9.4% | +5.5% | not measured | +2.9 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +21.7% | +17.1% | not measured | +2.1 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: AIFD May 2024 · PBOT Oct 2025 | +76.5% | +20.9% | not measured | +4.4 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
30% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
AIFD
By weight, 74% of AIFD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 74%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 34 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 21.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
PBOT
By weight, 61% of PBOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 44 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. It sits 17.2% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do AIFD and PBOT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AIFD against PBOT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aifd-vs-pbot
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). AIFD against PBOT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aifd-vs-pbot
[AIFD against PBOT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aifd-vs-pbot)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.