Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
URA vs XSD
Global X Uranium ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Semiconductor ETF, side by side on the themes desk.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| URA Global X Uranium ETF | XSD State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Semiconductor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | State Street |
| Theme | Nuclear and uranium | Semiconductors |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 33.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 89.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 27.5% |
| Holdings | 52 | 47 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 66.1% | 29.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +71.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −0.4 pts | +51.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −6.0 pts | +46.2 pts |
| Below its high | −47.6% | −24.3% |
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
XSD in plain words
By weight, 33% of XSD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 89%. The top ten holdings are 29% of the fund across 47 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +71.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 51.8 pts. It sits 24.3% below its all-time high of Jun 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do URA and XSD hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or XSD?
- URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XSD has 33%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, URA or XSD?
- URA charges 0.69% a year and XSD charges 0.35%, so XSD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against XSD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/URA-XSD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources