Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
URA vs XSD
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, URA and XSD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in URA | Only in XSD |
|---|---|
| CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% | MaxLinear Inc 3.75% |
| Oklo Inc 7.31% | Allegro MicroSystems Inc 3.30% |
| NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% | Astera Labs Inc 3.08% |
| URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% | Ambarella Inc 2.89% |
| Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% | Intel Corp 2.75% |
| Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% | Penguin Solutions Inc 2.74% |
| ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24% | Micron Technology Inc 2.73% |
| DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URA | XSD | URA | XSD | URA | XSD | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | −14.0% | −3.0 pts | −18.7 pts | −0.4 pts | −16.1 pts |
| 6 months | −5.6% | +52.8% | −20.7 pts | +37.7 pts | −25.7 pts | +32.7 pts |
| 1 year | +19.6% | +71.8% | −0.4 pts | +51.8 pts | −6.0 pts | +46.2 pts |
| 3 years | +112.1% | +133.1% | +34.1 pts | +55.2 pts | +18.6 pts | +39.7 pts |
| Since launch | −30.8% | +2140.8% | −760.5 pts | +1329.5 pts | −1465.7 pts | +456.8 pts |
| URA Global X Uranium ETF | XSD State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Semiconductor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | State Street |
| Theme | Nuclear and uranium | Semiconductors |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 33.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 89.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 27.5% |
| Holdings | 52 | 47 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 66.1% | 29.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +71.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −0.4 pts | +51.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −6.0 pts | +46.2 pts |
| Below its high | −47.6% | −24.3% |
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
XSD in plain words
By weight, 33% of XSD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 89%. The top ten holdings are 29% of the fund across 47 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +71.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 51.8 pts. It sits 24.3% below its all-time high of Jun 3, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do URA and XSD hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or XSD?
- URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XSD has 33%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, URA or XSD?
- URA charges 0.69% a year and XSD charges 0.35%, so XSD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against XSD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/URA-XSD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.