Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
URA vs XAR
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, URA and XAR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in URA | Only in XAR |
|---|---|
| CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% | VSE Corp 3.40% |
| Oklo Inc 7.31% | Axon Enterprise Inc 3.23% |
| NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% | StandardAero Inc 3.11% |
| URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% | FTAI Aviation Ltd 3.09% |
| Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% | Carpenter Technology Corp 3.04% |
| Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% | General Electric Co 3.02% |
| ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24% | Woodward Inc 2.98% |
| DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% | HEICO Corp 2.86% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URA | XAR | URA | XAR | URA | XAR | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | −7.2% | −3.0 pts | −11.9 pts | −0.4 pts | −9.3 pts |
| 6 months | −5.6% | −9.4% | −20.7 pts | −24.5 pts | −25.7 pts | −29.5 pts |
| 1 year | +19.6% | +17.9% | −0.4 pts | −2.1 pts | −6.0 pts | −7.7 pts |
| 3 years | +112.1% | +113.8% | +34.1 pts | +35.9 pts | +18.6 pts | +20.3 pts |
| Since launch | −30.8% | +1074.6% | −760.5 pts | +314.2 pts | −1465.7 pts | −342.9 pts |
| URA Global X Uranium ETF | XAR State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Aerospace & Defense ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | State Street |
| Theme | Nuclear and uranium | Defense |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 32.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 97.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 3.2% |
| Holdings | 52 | 48 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 66.1% | 30.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.36% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +17.9% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −0.4 pts | −2.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −6.0 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Below its high | −47.6% | −14.8% |
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
XAR in plain words
By weight, 32% of XAR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 48 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do URA and XAR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or XAR?
- URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XAR has 32%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, URA or XAR?
- URA charges 0.69% a year and XAR charges 0.35%, so XAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against XAR, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/URA-XAR.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.