Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
SMH vs TAN
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SMH and TAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SMH | Only in TAN |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 17.56% | First Solar, Inc. 11.74% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 9.29% | Nextpower Inc. 9.81% |
| Applied Materials Inc 5.74% | Enphase Energy, Inc. 8.75% |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.68% | Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 7.58% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.63% | SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 6.32% |
| KLA Corp 5.58% | Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 5.09% |
| Lam Research Corp 5.32% | Sunrun Inc. 4.83% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.28% | O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd. 4.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | TAN | SMH | TAN | SMH | TAN | |
| 3 months | −0.5% | −25.0% | −5.2 pts | −29.7 pts | −2.5 pts | −27.1 pts |
| 6 months | +49.0% | −9.8% | +33.8 pts | −25.0 pts | +28.8 pts | −30.0 pts |
| 1 year | +96.2% | +14.3% | +76.3 pts | −5.6 pts | +70.6 pts | −11.3 pts |
| 3 years | +267.0% | −16.7% | +189.0 pts | −94.7 pts | +173.5 pts | −110.2 pts |
| Since launch | +5013.0% | −38.6% | +4201.6 pts | −850.0 pts | +3328.9 pts | −1722.7 pts |
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | TAN Invesco Solar ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VanEck | Invesco |
| Theme | Semiconductors | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 82.0% | 11.7% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 85.9% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 25 | 31 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 70.3% | 65.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.70% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.43% | 0.70% |
| Total return, 1 year | +96.2% | +14.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +76.3 pts | −5.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +70.6 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Below its high | −15.2% | −60.4% |
SMH in plain words
By weight, 82% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 70% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +96.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 76.3 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
TAN in plain words
By weight, 12% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.6 pts. It sits 60.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do SMH and TAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, SMH or TAN?
- SMH has 82% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 12%, so TAN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, SMH or TAN?
- SMH charges 0.35% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so SMH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SMH against TAN, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/SMH-TAN.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.