Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
SKYY vs TAN
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SKYY and TAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SKYY | Only in TAN |
|---|---|
| Nutanix, Inc. (Class A) 4.27% | First Solar, Inc. 11.74% |
| Everpure, Inc. (Class A) 4.09% | Nextpower Inc. 9.81% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 3.97% | Enphase Energy, Inc. 8.75% |
| Microsoft Corporation 3.62% | Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 7.58% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 3.12% | SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 6.32% |
| MongoDB, Inc. 2.99% | Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 5.09% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 2.91% | Sunrun Inc. 4.83% |
| Atlassian Corporation (Class A) 2.88% | O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd. 4.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKYY | TAN | SKYY | TAN | SKYY | TAN | |
| 3 months | +14.8% | −25.0% | +10.1 pts | −29.7 pts | +12.7 pts | −27.1 pts |
| 6 months | +42.8% | −9.8% | +27.6 pts | −25.0 pts | +22.6 pts | −30.0 pts |
| 1 year | +26.4% | +14.3% | +6.5 pts | −5.6 pts | +0.9 pts | −11.3 pts |
| 3 years | +98.2% | −16.7% | +20.2 pts | −94.7 pts | +4.7 pts | −110.2 pts |
| Since launch | +723.9% | −38.6% | +74.8 pts | −850.0 pts | −579.0 pts | −1722.7 pts |
| SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing ETF | TAN Invesco Solar ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Invesco |
| Theme | Cloud and software | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 38.4% | 11.7% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 86.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 19.9% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 64 | 31 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.7% | 65.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.70% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.70% |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.4% | +14.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +6.5 pts | −5.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +0.9 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Below its high | −4.3% | −60.4% |
SKYY in plain words
By weight, 38% of SKYY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 64 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.5 pts.
TAN in plain words
By weight, 12% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.6 pts. It sits 60.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do SKYY and TAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, SKYY or TAN?
- SKYY has 38% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 12%, so TAN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, SKYY or TAN?
- SKYY charges 0.60% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so SKYY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SKYY against TAN, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/SKYY-TAN.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.