Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SIL vs XAR: which is really different?

SIL and XAR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SIL returned more over the year.

Global X Silver Miners ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Aerospace & Defense ETF, side by side, thematic ETFs on ETFIQ.

0.0%SIL in the S&P 500
35.0%XAR in the S&P 500
+49.1%SIL total return, 1 year
+11.8%XAR total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: SIL scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

SIL 91.4XAR 490.1, the lowest in this set91.4, the highest

A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

SIL100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 76% of the fund · 41 holdings filed Sep 11, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 76% of the fund
XAR65% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
35%65%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 31% of the fund · 49 holdings filed Sep 10, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in35%65%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 31% of the fund

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

SIL and XAR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
SILXARSILXARSILXAR
3 months+18.1%−12.1%+14.8 pts−15.4 pts+18.9 pts−11.3 pts
6 months+2.3%−7.2%−13.7 pts−23.2 pts−18.4 pts−27.9 pts
1 year+49.1%+11.8%+31.6 pts−5.7 pts+26.1 pts−11.2 pts
3 years+298.1%+114.1%+220.2 pts+36.2 pts+203.0 pts+19.0 pts
Since launch+159.8%+1042.3%−584.6 pts+288.5 pts−1393.6 pts−366.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SIL and XAR on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
Holds 41 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
XAR
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Aerospace & Defense ETF
Holds 49 stocks in defense, 35% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerGlobal XState Street
ThemeMiners and metalsDefense
In the S&P 5000.0%35.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500100.0%97.9%
In the Nasdaq-1000.0%3.2%
Holdings4149
Top ten, share of the fund76.1%31.4%
Expense ratio0.65%0.35%
Fee for the differing part0.65%0.36%
Total return, 1 year+49.1%+11.8%
vs the S&P 500+31.6 pts−5.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+26.1 pts−11.2 pts
Below its high−18.3%−17.1%

SIL in plain words

By weight, 0% of SIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +49.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 31.6 pts. It sits 18.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

XAR in plain words

By weight, 35% of XAR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 31% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +11.8% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. It sits 17.1% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do SIL and XAR hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SIL or XAR?
SIL has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XAR has 35%, so SIL differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SIL or XAR?
SIL charges 0.65% a year and XAR charges 0.35%, so XAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SIL against XAR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SIL against XAR, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/SIL-XAR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources