Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
KWEB vs SOXQ
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and SOXQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KWEB | Only in SOXQ |
|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47% | Micron Technology, Inc. 11.84% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.99% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% | Broadcom Inc. 8.79% |
| NETEASE, INC. 6.99% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 6.49% |
| MEITUAN 6.84% | Intel Corp. 6.33% |
| BAIDU, INC. 4.20% | Marvell Technology, Inc. 6.32% |
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% | QUALCOMM Inc. 4.44% |
| KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% | Texas Instruments Inc. 3.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | SOXQ | KWEB | SOXQ | KWEB | SOXQ | |
| 3 months | −1.2% | −4.0% | −5.9 pts | −8.7 pts | −3.3 pts | −6.1 pts |
| 6 months | −12.3% | +56.3% | −27.5 pts | +41.2 pts | −32.5 pts | +36.2 pts |
| 1 year | −27.2% | +107.9% | −47.2 pts | +87.9 pts | −52.8 pts | +82.3 pts |
| 3 years | +0.5% | +225.0% | −77.4 pts | +147.0 pts | −93.0 pts | +131.5 pts |
| Since launch | +27.7% | +282.6% | −435.6 pts | +187.7 pts | −918.5 pts | +165.3 pts |
| KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | Invesco |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Semiconductors |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 84.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 80.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 7.9% | 81.7% |
| Holdings | 33 | 30 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.2% | 63.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.19% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.24% |
| Total return, 1 year | −27.2% | +107.9% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −47.2 pts | +87.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −52.8 pts | +82.3 pts |
| Below its high | −69.8% | −19.7% |
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
SOXQ in plain words
By weight, 84% of SOXQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +107.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 87.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do KWEB and SOXQ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or SOXQ?
- KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SOXQ has 84%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KWEB or SOXQ?
- KWEB charges 0.69% a year and SOXQ charges 0.19%, so SOXQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against SOXQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/KWEB-SOXQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.