Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
IFRA vs QTUM
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IFRA and QTUM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IFRA | Only in QTUM |
|---|---|
| CATERPILLAR INC. 4.57% | Arqit Quantum Inc 2.43% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. 3.97% | Horizon Quantum Holdings LTD 2.40% |
| UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.88% | Quantinuum Inc 1.58% |
| QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 3.77% | Astera Labs Inc 1.56% |
| CSX Corporation 3.10% | Applied Materials Inc 1.56% |
| THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 2.92% | KLA Corp 1.51% |
| DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 2.67% | MKS Inc 1.51% |
| CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 2.51% | Onto Innovation Inc 1.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA | QTUM | IFRA | QTUM | IFRA | QTUM | |
| 3 months | −3.0% | −3.0% | −7.7 pts | −7.7 pts | −5.1 pts | −5.1 pts |
| 6 months | +2.3% | +35.5% | −12.8 pts | +20.3 pts | −17.8 pts | +15.3 pts |
| 1 year | +16.3% | +58.6% | −3.7 pts | +38.7 pts | −9.3 pts | +33.0 pts |
| 3 years | +63.9% | +196.2% | −14.1 pts | +118.3 pts | −29.6 pts | +102.8 pts |
| Since launch | +173.3% | +538.2% | −55.9 pts | +337.0 pts | −199.2 pts | +225.3 pts |
| IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | Defiance |
| Theme | Infrastructure | Quantum computing |
| In the S&P 500 | 75.7% | 35.6% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95.4% | 83.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 10.0% | 27.8% |
| Holdings | 161 | 86 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.4% | 17.0% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.40% |
| Fee for the differing part | not published | 0.48% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +58.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −3.7 pts | +38.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −9.3 pts | +33.0 pts |
| Below its high | −7.5% | −12.2% |
IFRA in plain words
By weight, 76% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 161 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.7 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
QTUM in plain words
By weight, 36% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 86 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +58.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 38.7 pts. It sits 12.2% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do IFRA and QTUM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, IFRA or QTUM?
- IFRA has 76% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QTUM has 36%, so IFRA differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IFRA against QTUM, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/IFRA-QTUM.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.