Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
BOTZ vs QTUM
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and QTUM hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BOTZ | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.28% | 1.07% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 8.31% | 1.07% |
| Only in BOTZ | Only in QTUM |
|---|---|
| KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.34% | Arqit Quantum Inc 2.43% |
| ABB Ltd 9.07% | Horizon Quantum Holdings LTD 2.40% |
| FANUC CORPORATION 9.02% | Quantinuum Inc 1.58% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.17% | Astera Labs Inc 1.56% |
| Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.34% | Applied Materials Inc 1.56% |
| SMC CORPORATION 4.03% | KLA Corp 1.51% |
| DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.53% | MKS Inc 1.51% |
| RoboTechnik Intelligent Technology Co Lt 2.74% | Onto Innovation Inc 1.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | QTUM | BOTZ | QTUM | BOTZ | QTUM | |
| 3 months | −5.3% | −3.0% | −10.0 pts | −7.7 pts | −7.4 pts | −5.1 pts |
| 6 months | −0.3% | +35.5% | −15.5 pts | +20.3 pts | −20.5 pts | +15.3 pts |
| 1 year | +8.6% | +58.6% | −11.3 pts | +38.7 pts | −16.9 pts | +33.0 pts |
| 3 years | +36.4% | +196.2% | −41.5 pts | +118.3 pts | −57.0 pts | +102.8 pts |
| Since launch | +153.8% | +538.2% | −170.6 pts | +337.0 pts | −415.5 pts | +225.3 pts |
| BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Defiance |
| Theme | Robotics and automation | Quantum computing |
| In the S&P 500 | 18.7% | 35.6% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 88.1% | 83.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 18.7% | 27.8% |
| Holdings | 61 | 86 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 59.0% | 17.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.40% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.77% | 0.48% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.6% | +58.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −11.3 pts | +38.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −16.9 pts | +33.0 pts |
| Below its high | −13.6% | −12.2% |
BOTZ in plain words
By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. It sits 13.6% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.
QTUM in plain words
By weight, 36% of QTUM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 86 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +58.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 38.7 pts. It sits 12.2% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BOTZ and QTUM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or QTUM?
- BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QTUM has 36%, so BOTZ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BOTZ or QTUM?
- BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and QTUM charges 0.40%, so QTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against QTUM, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BOTZ-QTUM.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.