Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
IFRA vs NLR
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IFRA and NLR hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IFRA | NLR |
|---|---|---|
| CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION. | 2.27% | 8.03% |
| PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPOR | 1.09% | 7.08% |
| ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED | 0.12% | 4.67% |
| Only in IFRA | Only in NLR |
|---|---|
| CATERPILLAR INC. 4.57% | Cameco Corp 8.39% |
| NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. 3.97% | BWX Technologies Inc 6.77% |
| UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.88% | Fortum Oyj 5.74% |
| QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 3.77% | Oklo Inc 5.21% |
| CSX Corporation 3.10% | Centrus Energy Corp 5.04% |
| THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 2.92% | Uranium Energy Corp 4.99% |
| DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 2.67% | NexGen Energy Ltd 4.96% |
| CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 2.51% | Denison Mines Corp 4.76% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA | NLR | IFRA | NLR | IFRA | NLR | |
| 3 months | −3.0% | −1.8% | −7.7 pts | −6.5 pts | −5.1 pts | −3.9 pts |
| 6 months | +2.3% | −11.8% | −12.8 pts | −27.0 pts | −17.8 pts | −32.0 pts |
| 1 year | +16.3% | +4.0% | −3.7 pts | −16.0 pts | −9.3 pts | −21.6 pts |
| 3 years | +63.9% | +95.8% | −14.1 pts | +17.9 pts | −29.6 pts | +2.4 pts |
| Since launch | +173.3% | +200.2% | −55.9 pts | −611.2 pts | −199.2 pts | −1483.9 pts |
| IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| Theme | Infrastructure | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 75.7% | 15.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 95.4% | 99.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 10.0% | 8.0% |
| Holdings | 161 | 25 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.4% | 61.0% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.52% |
| Fee for the differing part | not published | 0.52% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +4.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −3.7 pts | −16.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −9.3 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Below its high | −7.5% | −27.0% |
IFRA in plain words
By weight, 76% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 161 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.7 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
NLR in plain words
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 27.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do IFRA and NLR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, IFRA or NLR?
- IFRA has 76% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NLR has 15%, so NLR differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IFRA against NLR, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/IFRA-NLR.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.