ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

IFRA vs NASA

iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF and Tema Space Innovators ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IFRA and NASA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IFRAOnly in NASA
CATERPILLAR INC. 4.57%Rocket Lab Corp 12.12%
NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. 3.97%Planet Labs PBC 7.32%
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.88%Intuitive Machines Inc 7.17%
QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 3.77%SpaceX SPV Exposure (Preferred) 6.47%
CSX Corporation 3.10%AST SpaceMobile Inc 6.19%
THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 2.92%Firefly Aerospace Inc 5.42%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 2.67%BlackSky Technology Inc 4.33%
CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 2.51%5N Plus Inc 4.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IFRA and NASA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
IFRANASAIFRANASAIFRANASA
3 months−3.0%−27.9%−7.7 pts−32.6 pts−5.1 pts−30.0 pts
6 months+2.3%n/a−12.8 ptsn/a−17.8 ptsn/a
1 year+16.3%n/a−3.7 ptsn/a−9.3 ptsn/a
3 years+63.9%n/a−14.1 ptsn/a−29.6 ptsn/a
Since launch+173.3%−6.6%−55.9 pts−25.3 pts−199.2 pts−31.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IFRA and NASA on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
NASA
Tema Space Innovators ETF
IssueriSharesTema
ThemeInfrastructureSpace
In the S&P 50075.7%2.4%
Active share vs the S&P 50095.4%100.0%
In the Nasdaq-10010.0%0.0%
Holdings16137
Top ten, share of the fund32.4%60.8%
Expense rationot published0.75%
Fee for the differing partnot published0.75%
Total return, 1 year+16.3%−6.6% (since launch on Mar 31, 2026)
vs the S&P 500−3.7 pts−25.3 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−9.3 pts−31.3 pts
Below its high−7.5%−43.9%

IFRA in plain words

By weight, 76% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 161 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.7 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

NASA in plain words

By weight, 2% of NASA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −6.6% with distributions reinvested against +18.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. It sits 43.9% below its all-time high of May 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do IFRA and NASA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IFRA or NASA?
IFRA has 76% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NASA has 2%, so NASA differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IFRA against NASA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IFRA against NASA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/IFRA-NASA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources