Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
CIBR vs NASA
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and NASA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CIBR | Only in NASA |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 8.92% | Rocket Lab Corp 12.12% |
| CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.79% | Planet Labs PBC 7.32% |
| Fortinet, Inc. 8.54% | Intuitive Machines Inc 7.17% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 6.84% | SpaceX SPV Exposure (Preferred) 6.47% |
| Broadcom Inc. 6.04% | AST SpaceMobile Inc 6.19% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 4.35% | Firefly Aerospace Inc 5.42% |
| Okta, Inc. 4.17% | BlackSky Technology Inc 4.33% |
| Zscaler, Inc. 3.47% | 5N Plus Inc 4.08% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | NASA | CIBR | NASA | CIBR | NASA | |
| 3 months | +9.2% | −27.9% | +4.5 pts | −32.6 pts | +7.1 pts | −30.0 pts |
| 6 months | +43.7% | n/a | +28.5 pts | n/a | +23.5 pts | n/a |
| 1 year | +31.4% | n/a | +11.5 pts | n/a | +5.9 pts | n/a |
| 3 years | +102.4% | n/a | +24.5 pts | n/a | +8.9 pts | n/a |
| Since launch | +402.1% | −6.6% | +57.6 pts | −25.3 pts | −220.6 pts | −31.3 pts |
| CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Tema |
| Theme | Cybersecurity | Space |
| In the S&P 500 | 61.9% | 2.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 90.7% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 47.9% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 43 | 37 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 56.9% | 60.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.75% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.64% | 0.75% |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.4% | −6.6% (since launch on Mar 31, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +11.5 pts | −25.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +5.9 pts | −31.3 pts |
| Below its high | −7.5% | −43.9% |
CIBR in plain words
By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.5 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
NASA in plain words
By weight, 2% of NASA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −6.6% with distributions reinvested against +18.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. It sits 43.9% below its all-time high of May 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do CIBR and NASA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or NASA?
- CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NASA has 2%, so NASA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CIBR or NASA?
- CIBR charges 0.58% a year and NASA charges 0.75%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against NASA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/CIBR-NASA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.