ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

ICLN vs SOXX

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF and iShares Semiconductor ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ICLN and SOXX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ICLNOnly in SOXX
BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION 13.79%Micron Technology, Inc. 8.55%
NEXTPOWER INC. 7.31%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 8.10%
FIRST SOLAR, INC. 7.18%NVIDIA Corp. 6.82%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd. 5.92%Intel Corp. 6.34%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S 3.38%Broadcom, Inc. 6.08%
PLUG POWER INC. 3.29%Applied Materials, Inc. 5.78%
ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. 3.26%KLA Corp. 5.65%
EQUATORIAL S.A. 2.90%Marvell Technology, Inc. 5.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ICLN and SOXX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
ICLNSOXXICLNSOXXICLNSOXX
3 months−16.4%−3.6%−21.1 pts−8.3 pts−18.5 pts−5.7 pts
6 months+2.2%+60.9%−12.9 pts+45.7 pts−17.9 pts+40.7 pts
1 year+25.3%+113.9%+5.3 pts+93.9 pts−0.3 pts+88.3 pts
3 years+17.5%+210.8%−60.4 pts+132.9 pts−75.9 pts+117.4 pts
Since launch+10.6%+3635.3%−800.8 pts+2823.9 pts−1673.5 pts+1951.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ICLN and SOXX on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
ThemeClean energySemiconductors
In the S&P 5007.2%80.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500100.0%81.6%
In the Nasdaq-1000.0%78.4%
Holdings12230
Top ten, share of the fund51.8%61.7%
Expense ratio0.38%not published
Fee for the differing part0.38%not published
Total return, 1 year+25.3%+113.9%
vs the S&P 500+5.3 pts+93.9 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−0.3 pts+88.3 pts
Below its high−42.8%−20.6%

ICLN in plain words

By weight, 7% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 122 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. It sits 42.8% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.

SOXX in plain words

By weight, 81% of SOXX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +113.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 93.9 pts. It sits 20.6% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ICLN and SOXX hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ICLN or SOXX?
ICLN has 7% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SOXX has 81%, so ICLN differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ICLN against SOXX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ICLN against SOXX, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ICLN-SOXX.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources