Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
ICLN vs KWEB
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, side by side on the themes desk.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | KraneShares |
| Theme | Clean energy | Internet and e-commerce |
| In the S&P 500 | 7.2% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 7.9% |
| Holdings | 122 | 33 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 51.8% | 60.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.38% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.3% | −27.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +5.3 pts | −47.2 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −0.3 pts | −52.8 pts |
| Below its high | −42.8% | −69.8% |
ICLN in plain words
By weight, 7% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 122 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. It sits 42.8% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do ICLN and KWEB hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ICLN or KWEB?
- ICLN has 7% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so ICLN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, ICLN or KWEB?
- ICLN charges 0.38% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so ICLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ICLN against KWEB, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ICLN-KWEB.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources