Do BOTZ and KWEB hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or KWEB?

BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BOTZ or KWEB?

BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so BOTZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

BOTZ vs KWEB

Name: ETFIQ comparison of BOTZ and KWEB
Creator: ETFIQ

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

BOTZ and KWEB on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF	KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Issuer	Global X	KraneShares
Theme	Robotics and automation	Internet and e-commerce
In the S&P 500	18.7%	0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500	88.1%	100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100	18.7%	7.9%
Holdings	61	33
Top ten, share of the fund	59.0%	60.2%
Expense ratio	0.68%	0.69%
Fee for the differing part	0.77%	0.69%
Total return, 1 year	+8.6%	−27.2%
vs the S&P 500	−11.3 pts	−47.2 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100	−16.9 pts	−52.8 pts
Below its high	−13.6%	−69.8%

BOTZ in plain words

By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. It sits 13.6% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do BOTZ and KWEB hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or KWEB?: BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or KWEB?: BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so BOTZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against KWEB, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BOTZ-KWEB.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources