Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
FDN vs ICLN
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and ICLN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDN | Only in ICLN |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.84% | BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION 13.79% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 9.79% | NEXTPOWER INC. 7.31% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.22% | FIRST SOLAR, INC. 7.18% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 6.19% | China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd. 5.92% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 5.21% | VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S 3.38% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. 4.91% | PLUG POWER INC. 3.29% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.78% | ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. 3.26% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.52% | EQUATORIAL S.A. 2.90% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDN | ICLN | FDN | ICLN | FDN | ICLN | |
| 3 months | +7.0% | −16.4% | +2.3 pts | −21.1 pts | +4.9 pts | −18.5 pts |
| 6 months | +18.1% | +2.2% | +2.9 pts | −12.9 pts | −2.1 pts | −17.9 pts |
| 1 year | +3.8% | +25.3% | −16.2 pts | +5.3 pts | −21.8 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 3 years | +69.7% | +17.5% | −8.3 pts | −60.4 pts | −23.8 pts | −75.9 pts |
| Since launch | +1039.1% | +10.6% | +227.8 pts | −800.8 pts | −644.9 pts | −1673.5 pts |
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | iShares |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 82.7% | 7.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 85.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 57.3% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 42 | 122 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.6% | 51.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.38% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.57% | 0.38% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +25.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −16.2 pts | +5.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.8 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Below its high | −1.5% | −42.8% |
FDN in plain words
By weight, 83% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 42 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.2 pts.
ICLN in plain words
By weight, 7% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 122 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. It sits 42.8% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do FDN and ICLN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or ICLN?
- FDN has 83% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ICLN has 7%, so ICLN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or ICLN?
- FDN charges 0.49% a year and ICLN charges 0.38%, so ICLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDN against ICLN, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/FDN-ICLN.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.