Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
COPX vs ICLN
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and ICLN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in ICLN |
|---|---|
| Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% | BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION 13.79% |
| GLENCORE PLC 6.00% | NEXTPOWER INC. 7.31% |
| Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% | FIRST SOLAR, INC. 7.18% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% | China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd. 5.92% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% | VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S 3.38% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% | PLUG POWER INC. 3.29% |
| BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% | ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. 3.26% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% | EQUATORIAL S.A. 2.90% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | ICLN | COPX | ICLN | COPX | ICLN | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | −16.4% | +8.1 pts | −21.1 pts | +10.7 pts | −18.5 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | +2.2% | −1.4 pts | −12.9 pts | −6.4 pts | −17.9 pts |
| 1 year | +85.6% | +25.3% | +65.7 pts | +5.3 pts | +60.0 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 3 years | +153.8% | +17.5% | +75.8 pts | −60.4 pts | +60.3 pts | −75.9 pts |
| Since launch | +191.0% | +10.6% | −559.9 pts | −800.8 pts | −1371.8 pts | −1673.5 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.1% | 7.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 39 | 122 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 51.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.38% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.38% |
| Total return, 1 year | +85.6% | +25.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +65.7 pts | +5.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +60.0 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Below its high | −6.0% | −42.8% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
ICLN in plain words
By weight, 7% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 122 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. It sits 42.8% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do COPX and ICLN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or ICLN?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ICLN has 7%, so ICLN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or ICLN?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and ICLN charges 0.38%, so ICLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against ICLN, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/COPX-ICLN.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.