Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
CIBR vs COPX
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and COPX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CIBR | Only in COPX |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 8.92% | Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% |
| CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.79% | GLENCORE PLC 6.00% |
| Fortinet, Inc. 8.54% | Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 6.84% | KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% |
| Broadcom Inc. 6.04% | FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 4.35% | Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% |
| Okta, Inc. 4.17% | BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% |
| Zscaler, Inc. 3.47% | ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | COPX | CIBR | COPX | CIBR | COPX | |
| 3 months | +9.2% | +12.8% | +4.5 pts | +8.1 pts | +7.1 pts | +10.7 pts |
| 6 months | +43.7% | +13.8% | +28.5 pts | −1.4 pts | +23.5 pts | −6.4 pts |
| 1 year | +31.4% | +85.6% | +11.5 pts | +65.7 pts | +5.9 pts | +60.0 pts |
| 3 years | +102.4% | +153.8% | +24.5 pts | +75.8 pts | +8.9 pts | +60.3 pts |
| Since launch | +402.1% | +191.0% | +57.6 pts | −559.9 pts | −220.6 pts | −1371.8 pts |
| CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Theme | Cybersecurity | Electrification and the grid |
| In the S&P 500 | 61.9% | 5.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 90.7% | 99.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 47.9% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 43 | 39 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 56.9% | 53.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.65% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.64% | 0.65% |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.4% | +85.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +11.5 pts | +65.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +5.9 pts | +60.0 pts |
| Below its high | −7.5% | −6.0% |
CIBR in plain words
By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.5 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do CIBR and COPX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or COPX?
- CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and COPX has 5%, so COPX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CIBR or COPX?
- CIBR charges 0.58% a year and COPX charges 0.65%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against COPX, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/CIBR-COPX.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.