Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
BOTZ vs COPX
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and COPX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BOTZ | Only in COPX |
|---|---|
| KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.34% | Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% |
| ABB Ltd 9.07% | GLENCORE PLC 6.00% |
| FANUC CORPORATION 9.02% | Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.31% | KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.17% | FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% |
| Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.34% | Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% |
| SMC CORPORATION 4.03% | BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% |
| DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.53% | ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | COPX | BOTZ | COPX | BOTZ | COPX | |
| 3 months | −5.3% | +12.8% | −10.0 pts | +8.1 pts | −7.4 pts | +10.7 pts |
| 6 months | −0.3% | +13.8% | −15.5 pts | −1.4 pts | −20.5 pts | −6.4 pts |
| 1 year | +8.6% | +85.6% | −11.3 pts | +65.7 pts | −16.9 pts | +60.0 pts |
| 3 years | +36.4% | +153.8% | −41.5 pts | +75.8 pts | −57.0 pts | +60.3 pts |
| Since launch | +153.8% | +191.0% | −170.6 pts | −559.9 pts | −415.5 pts | −1371.8 pts |
| BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Theme | Robotics and automation | Electrification and the grid |
| In the S&P 500 | 18.7% | 5.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 88.1% | 99.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 18.7% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 61 | 39 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 59.0% | 53.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.77% | 0.65% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.6% | +85.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −11.3 pts | +65.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −16.9 pts | +60.0 pts |
| Below its high | −13.6% | −6.0% |
BOTZ in plain words
By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. It sits 13.6% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BOTZ and COPX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or COPX?
- BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and COPX has 5%, so COPX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BOTZ or COPX?
- BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and COPX charges 0.65%, so COPX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against COPX, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BOTZ-COPX.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.