Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
ARTY vs GRID
7% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ARTY and GRID hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ARTY | GRID |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 4.37% | 2.34% |
| ORACLE CORPORATION | 3.05% | 1.20% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT | 2.55% | 0.85% |
| Only in ARTY | Only in GRID |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.39% | Schneider Electric SE 9.11% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 5.24% | Eaton Corporation Plc 8.80% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.84% | Johnson Controls International Plc 8.49% |
| MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.54% | ABB Ltd 7.70% |
| COREWEAVE, INC. 4.27% | Quanta Services, Inc. 7.53% |
| BROADCOM INC. 4.25% | National Grid Plc 4.14% |
| SK hynix Inc. 3.63% | E.ON SE 4.11% |
| SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC. 3.19% | Prysmian SpA 3.53% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARTY | GRID | ARTY | GRID | ARTY | GRID | |
| 3 months | +7.9% | −4.2% | +3.2 pts | −8.9 pts | +5.8 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 6 months | +58.8% | +8.4% | +43.6 pts | −6.8 pts | +38.6 pts | −11.8 pts |
| 1 year | +79.1% | +26.6% | +59.1 pts | +6.6 pts | +53.5 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 3 years | +137.7% | +85.1% | +59.7 pts | +7.1 pts | +44.2 pts | −8.4 pts |
| Since launch | +243.1% | +554.4% | +21.8 pts | −257.0 pts | −99.4 pts | −1129.7 pts |
| ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | First Trust |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Electrification and the grid |
| In the S&P 500 | 49.7% | 39.9% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 84.1% | 91.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 36.5% | 8.6% |
| Holdings | 61 | 121 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 42.9% | 58.4% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.56% |
| Fee for the differing part | not published | 0.61% |
| Total return, 1 year | +79.1% | +26.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +59.1 pts | +6.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +53.5 pts | +1.0 pts |
| Below its high | −5.6% | −10.1% |
ARTY in plain words
By weight, 50% of ARTY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 43% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +79.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 59.1 pts. It sits 5.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
GRID in plain words
By weight, 40% of GRID's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 121 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.6 pts. It sits 10.1% below its all-time high of May 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do ARTY and GRID hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ARTY or GRID?
- ARTY has 50% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GRID has 40%, so GRID differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ARTY against GRID, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ARTY-GRID.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.