Which came closer to its stated multiple, WDCC or WDCX?

Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, WDCC finished 4.1 points from what its multiple implies and WDCX finished 10.7 points from its own, so WDCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are WDCC and WDCX levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on WDC, WDCC at +2 times and WDCX at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, WDCC or WDCX?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window WDCC’s moved at 64% annualized and WDCX’s at 97%, so WDCX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold WDCC or WDCX for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of Sep 11, 2026.

WDCC vs WDCX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, WDCC finished 4.1 points from its stated multiple and WDCX 4.3.

Corgi WDC 2x Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−49.2%WDCC returned, 3 months

−51.7%WDCX returned, 3 months

−2.7 ptsWDCC from its stated multiple

−10.7 ptsWDCX from its stated multiple

WDCC4.1 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026

WDCX10.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026

Performance, window by window

WDCC and WDCX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
Window	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	WDCC	WDCX	WDCC	WDCX	WDCC	WDCX
1 month	−7.1%	−7.3%	−3.0%	−3.0%	−4.1 pts	−4.3 pts
3 months	not published	−51.7%	not published	−41.1%	not published	−10.7 pts
6 months	not published	+77.6%	not published	+128.7%	not published	−51.1 pts
Since launch	−49.2%	+87.0%	−46.4%	+154.4%	−2.7 pts	−67.3 pts

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

WDCC and WDCX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	WDCC Corgi WDC 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of WDC	WDCX Tradr 2X Long WDC Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of WDC
Issuer	Corgi	Tradr
Sets out to return	+2x	+2x
On	WDC	WDC
Segment	company	company
Fund returned, 3 months	−7.1%	−51.7%
Underlying returned, 3 months	−1.5%	−20.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months	−3.0%	−41.1%
Difference from stated, 3 months	−4.1 pts	−10.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch	−49.2%	+87.0%
Difference from stated, over that window	−2.7 pts	−67.3 pts
Underlying volatility	64%	97%
Difference over the days both have traded	−4.1 pts	−4.3 pts
Expense ratio	not published	1.49%
Launched	Jul 10, 2026	Jan 27, 2026

WDCC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: WDCC returned −7.1% where its own daily promise gave −6.3%, 0.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times WDC's −1.5% implies −3.0%, which makes WDCC look 4.1 points short. 3.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. WDCC aims to return +2 times WDC's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. WDC moved at 64% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

WDCX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: WDCX returned −51.7% where its own daily promise gave −50.2%, 1.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times WDC's −20.5% implies −41.1%, which makes WDCX look 10.7 points short. 9.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. WDCX aims to return +2 times WDC's move each day, then resets. WDC moved at 97% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, WDCC or WDCX?: Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, WDCC finished 4.1 points from what its multiple implies and WDCX finished 10.7 points from its own, so WDCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are WDCC and WDCX levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on WDC, WDCC at +2 times and WDCX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, WDCC or WDCX?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window WDCC’s moved at 64% annualized and WDCX’s at 97%, so WDCX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold WDCC or WDCX for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

WDCC against WDCX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, WDCC against WDCX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/WDCC-WDCX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources