Data as of .
UUUC vs UUUG: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, UUUC finished 2.8 points from its stated multiple and UUUG 3.1.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UUUC | UUUG | UUUC | UUUG | UUUC | UUUG | |
| 1 month | −23.8% | −24.1% | −21.0% | −21.0% | −2.8 pts | −3.1 pts |
| 3 months | not published | −36.2% | not published | −27.8% | not published | −8.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −66.9% | not published | −61.3% | not published | −5.7 pts |
| Since launch | −18.6% | −75.8% | −9.3% | −66.6% | −9.3 pts | −9.2 pts |
| UUUC Corgi UUUU 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of UUUU | UUUG Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of UUUU | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Corgi | Leverage Shares |
| Sets out to return | +2x | +2x |
| On | UUUU | UUUU |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −23.8% | −36.2% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | −10.5% | −13.9% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | −21.0% | −27.8% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −2.8 pts | −8.4 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −18.6% | −75.8% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −9.3 pts | −9.2 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 67% | 67% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −2.8 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.75% |
| Launched | Jul 10, 2026 | Jan 13, 2026 |
UUUC in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: UUUC returned −23.8% where its own daily promise gave −22.9%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times UUUU's −10.5% implies −21.0%, which makes UUUC look 2.8 points short. 1.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UUUC aims to return +2 times UUUU's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. UUUU moved at 67% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
UUUG in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UUUG returned −36.2% where its own daily promise gave −33.5%, 2.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times UUUU's −13.9% implies −27.8%, which makes UUUG look 8.4 points short. 5.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UUUG aims to return +2 times UUUU's move each day, then resets.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, UUUC or UUUG?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, UUUC finished 2.8 points from what its multiple implies and UUUG finished 8.4 points from its own, so UUUC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are UUUC and UUUG levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on UUUU, UUUC at +2 times and UUUG at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, UUUC or UUUG?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window UUUC’s moved at 67% annualized and UUUG’s at 67%, so UUUC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold UUUC or UUUG for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, UUUC against UUUG, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/UUUC-UUUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.