Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

USLV vs ZSL: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, USLV finished 2.4 points short and ZSL 2.8 points over.

Direxion Daily Silver Bull 2X ETF and ProShares UltraShort Silver, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−16.4%USLV returned, 3 months
+0.8%ZSL returned, 3 months
−6.0 ptsUSLV from its stated multiple
−9.5 ptsZSL from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: ZSL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

USLV 55.4ZSL 83.90.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

USLV6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
SLV −5.2% ×2 implies−10.3%USLV returned−16.4%SLV −5.2% ×2 implies−10.3%USLV returned−16.4%
ZSL9.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
SLV −5.2% ×2 implies+10.3%ZSL returned+0.8%SLV −5.2% ×2 implies+10.3%ZSL returned+0.8%

Performance, window by window

USLV and ZSL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
USLVZSLUSLVZSLUSLVZSL
1 month−5.4%+1.1%−3.2%+3.2%−2.2 pts−2.1 pts
3 months−16.4%+0.8%−10.3%+10.3%−6.0 pts−9.5 pts
6 monthsnot published+16.8%not published+40.1%not published−23.3 pts
1 yearnot published−87.2%not published−107.6%not published+20.4 pts
3 yearsnot published−96.9%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch−34.1%−100.0%−30.0%not meaningful−4.2 ptsnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
USLV and ZSL on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USLV
Direxion Daily Silver Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of silver (SLV)
ZSL
ProShares UltraShort Silver
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of silver (SLV)
IssuerDirexionProShares
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnSLVSLV
Segmentmetalmetal
Fund returned, 3 months−16.4%+0.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months−5.2%−5.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−10.3%+10.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−6.0 pts−9.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−34.1%−87.2%
Difference from stated, over that window−4.2 pts+20.4 pts
Underlying volatility42%42%
Difference over the days both have traded−6.0 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio1.10%not published
LaunchedMay 28, 2026Jan 4, 2010

USLV in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: USLV returned −16.4% where its own daily promise gave −13.9%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times SLV's −5.2% implies −10.3%, which makes USLV look 6.0 points short. 3.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. USLV aims to return +2 times SLV's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SLV moved at 42% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ZSL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ZSL returned +0.8% where its own daily promise gave −2.0%, 2.8 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SLV's −5.2% implies +10.3%, which makes ZSL look 9.5 points short. 12.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ZSL aims to return -2 times SLV's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, USLV or ZSL?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, USLV finished 6.0 points from what its multiple implies and ZSL finished 9.5 points from its own, so USLV came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are USLV and ZSL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on silver, USLV at +2 times and ZSL at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, USLV or ZSL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window USLV’s moved at 42% annualized and ZSL’s at 42%, so USLV has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold USLV or ZSL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

USLV against ZSL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, USLV against ZSL, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/USLV-ZSL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources