Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

UGL vs UGLD: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, UGL finished 2.6 points from its stated multiple and UGLD 3.9.

ProShares Ultra Gold and Direxion Daily Gold Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+3.8%UGL returned, 3 months
+2.4%UGLD returned, 3 months
−2.6 ptsUGL from its stated multiple
−3.9 ptsUGLD from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: UGL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

UGL 95.8UGLD 55.40.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

UGL2.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLD +3.2% ×2 implies+6.3%UGL returned+3.8%GLD +3.2% ×2 implies+6.3%UGL returned+3.8%
UGLD3.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLD +3.2% ×2 implies+6.3%UGLD returned+2.4%GLD +3.2% ×2 implies+6.3%UGLD returned+2.4%

Performance, window by window

UGL and UGLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
UGLUGLDUGLUGLDUGLUGLD
1 month−3.9%−4.3%−3.0%−3.0%−0.9 pts−1.2 pts
3 months+3.8%+2.4%+6.3%+6.3%−2.6 pts−3.9 pts
6 months−29.6%not published−26.9%not published−2.7 ptsnot published
1 year+22.3%not published+38.2%not published−15.9 ptsnot published
3 years+254.7%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch+330.8%−11.3%not meaningful−6.8%not meaningful−4.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
UGL and UGLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
Aims to return twice the daily move of gold (GLD)
UGLD
Direxion Daily Gold Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of gold (GLD)
IssuerProSharesDirexion
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnGLDGLD
Segmentmetalmetal
Fund returned, 3 months+3.8%+2.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.2%+3.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+6.3%+6.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.6 pts−3.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+22.3%−11.3%
Difference from stated, over that window−15.9 pts−4.5 pts
Underlying volatility25%25%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.6 pts−3.9 pts
Expense rationot published1.07%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010May 28, 2026

UGL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UGL returned +3.8% where its own daily promise gave +4.8%, 1.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GLD's 3.2% implies +6.3%, which makes UGL look 2.6 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UGL aims to return +2 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GLD moved at 25% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UGLD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UGLD returned +2.4% where its own daily promise gave +4.8%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GLD's 3.2% implies +6.3%, which makes UGLD look 3.9 points short. UGLD aims to return +2 times GLD's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, UGL or UGLD?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, UGL finished 2.6 points from what its multiple implies and UGLD finished 3.9 points from its own, so UGL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are UGL and UGLD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on gold, UGL at +2 times and UGLD at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, UGL or UGLD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window UGL’s moved at 25% annualized and UGLD’s at 25%, so UGL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold UGL or UGLD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

UGL against UGLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, UGL against UGLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/UGL-UGLD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources